Game pills lead to that game's statistics; choose the range there (Keno covers at most the last 1000 draws, about 4 days).
Tables computed from recent Keno draws (20 out of 70 numbers, a draw every 4 minutes). Every view states how many draws it covers, the time span and when the data was updated. Statistics describe past draws and do not improve the odds of any set in the next draw — every draw is independent.
Analyses: the last 7 completed days in Warsaw time, excluding today’s draws. 19.10.2026 – 25.10.2026.
Available draws in the analysis: 1827 / 1827.
1827 draws;
from
to (Warsaw time);
Last successful data publication: .
Statistics describe past draws and do not improve the odds of any set in the next draw.
Number frequency 1–70
How many times each number was drawn in the selected window. Expected frequency of every number: 522 (20/70 of draws).
1523
2529
3494
4522
5512
6555
7557
8513
9544
10539
11508
12524
13541
14525
15536
16507
17527
18500
19549
20506
21507
22522
23523
24522
25521
26510
27521
28534
29511
30505
31496
32525
33491
34527
35527
36497
37522
38517
39507
40515
41505
42555
43485
44542
45543
46509
47545
48524
49510
50536
51513
52538
53555
54557
55504
56550
57501
58531
59505
60539
61472
62521
63560
64509
65490
66523
67517
68515
69516
70559
Most frequent in window
63560 times
70559 times
7557 times
54557 times
6555 times
42555 times
53555 times
56550 times
19549 times
47545 times
Least frequent in window
61472 times
43485 times
65490 times
33491 times
3494 times
31496 times
36497 times
18500 times
57501 times
55504 times
Gaps
How many draws since each number last appeared. The range is wider than the selected window (7 complete days): the whole history in the statistics file, i.e. the last 1827 draws, from 19.10.2026, 06:34 to 25.10.2026, 23:54 (Warsaw time). “—” = the number did not appear in this history.
13
21
30
41
51
60
70
82
90
105
110
129
130
140
151
162
171
185
194
204
216
224
231
240
250
261
271
284
293
300
310
320
331
342
350
364
370
387
396
401
414
421
431
447
450
463
476
480
4910
506
515
522
532
543
550
563
573
581
5910
600
617
626
631
643
652
663
671
685
690
700
Even and odd
Distribution of the number of even numbers per draw (0 to 20). Average even numbers: 10.07.
Even and odd
even
draws
5
16
6
45
7
108
8
225
9
306
10
361
11
334
12
242
13
129
14
42
15
16
16
2
17
1
Sums of the 20 numbers
Lowest 462, highest 958, average 709.7. Distribution in bands of 50.
Retrospective assessment uses up to 500 available recent draws. Keno draws 20 of 70; amounts and the multiplier are not assessed.
Replay the past, one draw at a time
Before each assessed draw, nine fixed rules select the same number of main numbers using only earlier results. We then count the overlap with the real result. These are explicit selection rules based on analyses, not a claim that every statistic predicts numbers.
The target draw and all later draws are excluded from every calculation. No future selection or recommended numbers are generated. Additional pools are assessed separately below where available.
Actual history: 50 · 25.10.2026 20:38 — 25.10.2026 23:54. Assessed steps: 25 (exploration 15, later assessment 10).
What matched the latest assessed draw?
25.10.2026 23:54 · #1518353
3
6
7
9
11
13
14
24
25
30
31
32
35
37
45
48
55
60
69
70
Calculations used earlier draws only: #1518328 — #1518352, 25.10.2026 22:14 — 25.10.2026 23:50.
Rule
Earlier selection; ✓ marks overlap
Hits
Most frequent
1
2
6
✓
8
9
✓
10
17
23
27
29
30
✓
34
40
42
45
✓
48
✓
56
57
58
63
5 / 20
Least frequent
3
✓
11
✓
12
15
18
20
22
25
✓
32
✓
35
✓
36
43
44
49
50
52
53
60
✓
61
67
6 / 20
Longest gaps
3
✓
10
12
13
✓
18
21
24
✓
25
✓
37
✓
38
39
44
47
49
50
51
59
61
62
68
5 / 20
Repeats
2
4
5
6
✓
9
✓
15
17
23
26
27
30
✓
33
40
42
43
45
✓
55
✓
58
63
67
5 / 20
Partners
1
2
6
✓
8
9
✓
10
17
23
27
30
✓
33
34
40
42
45
✓
47
55
✓
58
63
66
5 / 20
Binary rhythm (2 bits)
1
6
✓
9
✓
14
✓
17
19
21
23
28
34
39
40
48
✓
57
58
60
✓
62
63
64
66
5 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 2–12; selections with no example: 0.
Binary rhythm (3 bits)
10
14
✓
17
18
19
23
24
✓
26
27
28
30
✓
34
40
51
54
57
58
60
✓
62
63
4 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 1–9; selections with no example: 0.
Binary rhythm (4 bits)
7
✓
13
✓
14
✓
17
18
21
27
28
30
✓
37
✓
39
40
41
42
47
51
61
62
63
68
5 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 1–6; selections with no example: 0.
Binary rhythm (5 bits)
2
4
6
✓
7
✓
10
11
✓
13
✓
14
✓
16
17
18
20
28
30
✓
38
39
40
42
51
61
6 / 20Earlier pattern examples: 0–3; selections with no example: 7.
More overlaps in one draw describe that draw. They do not establish a dependable method.
Which rules matched more often in this history?
The first 60% of assessed steps form exploration. Its leaders are marked below; the ranking uses only the later 40% assessment period. All rules use the same draws and selection size.
Random-model expectation: 20 × 20 / 70 = 5.714 hits per draw; 10 assessment draws → 57.14 total expected hits.
Rank / rule
Exploration mean
Assessment mean
Difference from model
Assessment total
Whole-period mean
1. Binary rhythm (5 bits)
5.333
6.500
0.786
65
5.800
2. Partners
6.200
6.400
0.686
64
6.280
3. Most frequentExploration leader (ties possible)
6.267
6.200
0.486
62
6.240
3. Longest gaps
6.200
6.200
0.486
62
6.200
5. Binary rhythm (3 bits)
5.400
6.000
0.286
60
5.640
6. Binary rhythm (2 bits)
5.933
5.800
0.086
58
5.880
6. Binary rhythm (4 bits)
5.933
5.800
0.086
58
5.880
8. Least frequent
6.067
5.700
-0.014
57
5.920
9. Repeats
5.733
5.600
-0.114
56
5.680
A positive difference is an observation, not statistical proof of an advantage. Comparing nine rules and changing settings after seeing their results increases the risk of finding an accidental leader. Both periods remain retrospective; they are not a preregistered validation.
Fewer than 30 assessment draws: the ranking can change sharply after a single draw.
Accumulated overlap in the later assessment period — Most frequent
Solid line: actual accumulated hits. Dashed line: uniform-model expectation for the same number of draws and selections. The line is not a confidence interval.
X: assessed draws; Y: accumulated hits.
Inspect the latest 20 chronological steps
Target draw
Earlier training IDs
Earlier selection
Hits
25.10.2026 23:54 · #1518353
#1518328 — #1518352
1
2
6
✓
8
9
✓
10
17
23
27
29
30
✓
34
40
42
45
✓
48
✓
56
57
58
63
5 / 20
25.10.2026 23:50 · #1518352
#1518327 — #1518351
1
2
✓
6
✓
8
9
✓
10
17
✓
23
✓
27
✓
29
30
✓
34
45
✓
48
56
57
58
✓
63
✓
66
68
10 / 20
25.10.2026 23:46 · #1518351
#1518326 — #1518350
1
2
✓
8
✓
9
10
17
✓
23
✓
27
29
34
✓
37
45
46
48
56
57
58
✓
63
66
68
6 / 20
25.10.2026 23:42 · #1518350
#1518325 — #1518349
1
✓
8
✓
9
10
17
23
✓
27
34
✓
37
40
42
45
47
48
✓
51
56
✓
57
✓
58
63
68
7 / 20
25.10.2026 23:38 · #1518349
#1518324 — #1518348
1
8
9
10
17
27
30
34
37
40
42
45
46
47
48
51
57
✓
58
✓
63
✓
68
3 / 20
25.10.2026 23:34 · #1518348
#1518323 — #1518347
1
8
9
✓
10
✓
17
27
✓
30
34
✓
37
✓
40
42
44
45
✓
46
47
48
57
58
63
✓
68
✓
8 / 20
25.10.2026 23:30 · #1518347
#1518322 — #1518346
1
2
8
✓
9
✓
10
17
19
✓
27
30
✓
34
40
42
✓
44
45
46
47
✓
48
57
63
✓
68
7 / 20
25.10.2026 23:26 · #1518346
#1518321 — #1518345
1
✓
8
9
✓
10
✓
17
19
27
34
40
42
45
✓
46
47
✓
48
✓
57
58
63
64
66
68
6 / 20
25.10.2026 23:22 · #1518345
#1518320 — #1518344
1
✓
8
9
✓
10
17
✓
19
23
24
27
✓
34
40
42
45
46
47
48
51
58
62
63
4 / 20
25.10.2026 23:18 · #1518344
#1518319 — #1518343
1
✓
7
9
10
✓
13
17
19
23
24
27
✓
34
40
42
45
46
47
48
✓
57
62
✓
63
✓
6 / 20
25.10.2026 23:14 · #1518343
#1518318 — #1518342
1
7
9
✓
13
17
✓
19
23
✓
24
✓
27
✓
34
37
40
42
✓
45
46
47
48
57
62
63
6 / 20
25.10.2026 23:10 · #1518342
#1518317 — #1518341
1
7
✓
13
14
17
19
✓
23
✓
24
27
34
✓
37
40
42
45
✓
46
47
48
51
57
✓
63
✓
7 / 20
25.10.2026 23:06 · #1518341
#1518316 — #1518340
1
7
✓
9
13
17
✓
19
23
24
27
34
✓
40
42
✓
45
46
48
51
57
62
63
64
4 / 20
25.10.2026 23:02 · #1518340
#1518315 — #1518339
1
✓
7
9
13
17
✓
19
23
✓
24
27
✓
34
✓
37
40
42
✓
45
46
48
✓
51
57
63
✓
66
8 / 20
25.10.2026 22:58 · #1518339
#1518314 — #1518338
1
7
13
17
✓
19
27
28
34
37
40
42
44
45
46
47
48
51
✓
57
✓
63
✓
64
4 / 20
25.10.2026 22:54 · #1518338
#1518313 — #1518337
7
9
13
17
✓
19
24
28
✓
34
✓
37
40
✓
42
✓
44
45
46
✓
47
48
50
51
57
63
6 / 20
25.10.2026 22:50 · #1518337
#1518312 — #1518336
7
9
13
✓
17
19
✓
24
28
34
✓
37
40
✓
44
45
46
47
48
50
51
63
✓
64
66
5 / 20
25.10.2026 22:46 · #1518336
#1518311 — #1518335
1
7
9
13
✓
17
19
24
28
30
34
✓
37
40
✓
44
✓
45
✓
46
✓
47
✓
48
50
51
66
7 / 20
25.10.2026 22:42 · #1518335
#1518310 — #1518334
5
9
13
✓
17
19
✓
25
28
30
32
34
✓
40
✓
44
45
✓
46
47
✓
48
✓
50
51
53
66
✓
8 / 20
25.10.2026 22:38 · #1518334
#1518309 — #1518333
9
✓
13
17
✓
19
23
24
25
30
32
✓
34
40
✓
44
45
46
✓
47
✓
48
✓
50
51
✓
53
✓
66
9 / 20
Which draw properties matched the earlier history?
For each step, we build an empirical range from the earlier window only: sorted positions floor(0.1 × (N−1)) and ceil(0.9 × (N−1)), inclusive. We check whether the later actual property lies inside it. Discrete values and ties can make coverage exceed 80%. These are descriptive ranges, not confidence intervals or number selections.
Property
Earlier median, latest step
Earlier range
Actual latest value
Inside, later assessment
Sum
693
598–804 (N=25)
624 · inside
9/10 · 90.0%
Range
65
60–68 (N=25)
67 · inside
9/10 · 90.0%
Even numbers
10
8–12 (N=25)
8 · inside
9/10 · 90.0%
High numbers
9
7–12 (N=25)
7 · inside
10/10 · 100.0%
Repeats from the preceding draw
5.5
4–8 (N=24)
5 · inside
9/10 · 90.0%
Band 1–10
4
1–5 (N=25)
4 · inside
6/10 · 60.0%
Band 11–20
2
1–4 (N=25)
3 · inside
7/10 · 70.0%
Band 21–30
3
1–5 (N=25)
3 · inside
10/10 · 100.0%
Band 31–40
3
1–4 (N=25)
4 · inside
10/10 · 100.0%
Band 41–50
3
1–4 (N=25)
2 · inside
9/10 · 90.0%
Band 51–60
3
1–5 (N=25)
2 · inside
9/10 · 90.0%
Band 61–70
3
2–4 (N=25)
2 · inside
10/10 · 100.0%
Properties have different units and are not ranked together by number hits. Bands are 1–10, 11–20, etc.; the final band ends at the pool limit. Repeat examples require a predecessor within the earlier window, so their sample is one draw shorter.
Does the historical leader remain the same?
The later assessment is divided into consecutive, non-overlapping periods. All tied leaders are shown; the final incomplete period remains visible. Periods below 15 draws are marked as small.
Changes in the set of leaders: 0/0 period boundaries.
Period
N
Leaders, including ties
Leader total
25.10.2026 23:18 — 25.10.2026 23:54
10 · small sample
Binary rhythm (5 bits)
65
Changing a period size after seeing the outcome is retrospective fitting. This view does not establish a dependable rule.
Your selection in the same history
Enter your main numbers in the form above or open this view from My number report.
Save this historical assessment
JSON stores settings and calculated results; CSV contains the ranking. The HTML snapshot can be opened without internet and contains the visible assessment, not a new offline calculation. Exports include your entered numbers: share them only deliberately.
Exactly what is being compared?
Most frequent
Highest hit counts in the earlier window.
Least frequent
Lowest hit counts in the earlier window.
Longest gaps
Longest absence at the end of the earlier window. A number absent throughout the window has a gap of at least that window length.
Repeats
Numbers from the last earlier draw come first; numeric order resolves the remaining ties.
Partners
Sum of co-occurrence shares with numbers from the last earlier draw. Each partner count is divided by the anchor number’s frequency; self-pairs are excluded.
Binary rhythm (2 bits)
For each number, take its final two earlier presence bits, find that pattern in the earlier window, and measure how often a 1 followed it. Add two model-weighted pseudo-observations. A pattern without previous examples receives the model baseline.
Binary rhythm (3 bits)
Uses the final 3 earlier bits and known historical successors, with the same two model-weighted pseudo-observations as the two-bit rule. No earlier examples means the model baseline.
Binary rhythm (4 bits)
Uses the final 4 earlier bits and known historical successors, with the same two model-weighted pseudo-observations as the two-bit rule. No earlier examples means the model baseline.
Binary rhythm (5 bits)
Uses the final 5 earlier bits and known historical successors, with the same two model-weighted pseudo-observations as the two-bit rule. No earlier examples means the model baseline.
Sums, parity, ranges and decades describe a whole draw. They cannot fairly be ranked by number overlap without inventing additional selection rules. This page therefore compares only the nine rules defined above. Each independent draw retains the same odds.
What do these tables show?
Frequency tells how many times each of the 70 numbers was drawn in the selected window; with 20 numbers per draw the expected frequency of every number is 20/70 of the draws. The gap is the number of draws since a number last appeared within the data used for this calculation, within a limited sample of recent draws. If a number does not appear in that sample, its exact gap is unknown. Even/odd and sums describe the structure of draws: how many even numbers and which sum of 20 numbers appeared most often.
What can these statistics not do?
They do not suggest numbers to play and do not say how much to play. A number that was "hot" in the last 100 draws has exactly the same chance in the next draw as any other: 20 out of 70. This section covers frequency, gaps, even/odd counts and sums. It does not include pair or triple analyses or the full draw archive.
Advertisement
Advertisement unavailable offline The page content remains available.