Skip to content
⌕ Search this site

Advertisement

Current gaps Lotto

How long has each number gone without being drawn, and is that long for this game?

What would you like to check?

Enter or load your numbers in the analyzer. The latest draw report describes the actual draw, not your selection.

Explore all statistics — guided topics

These pages describe the history of this game. They do not predict future numbers. Use the selection tool on a page to compare your own numbers.

Numbers and gaps

Start with frequency and gaps: how often each number appeared in the selected historical sample.

Draw structure

Compare sum, parity, endings and range. On a page with a selection comparison, open it to check your numbers.

Relationships and random model

Explore pairs, triples and partners, then the random model. Historical relationships do not improve future odds.

Draws and tools

Read the latest draw report for the actual drawn numbers. Use the analyzer and matching draws for your own selection.

Game
Lotto
Number pool
49
Selected range
50 most recent
Draws in the sample
50
From
2026-06-06T20:00:00Z
To
2026-09-29T20:00:00Z
Latest draw in the sample
2026-09-29T20:00:00Z
Calculated at
2026-10-01T19:41:28+02:00
Source
Service draw archive
Freshness
Checking…

Current gaps of numbers

State after the latest draw of Lotto, computed from the full history (6,546 draws). A gap is the number of draws in which a given number was not drawn. The random model assumes that each of the 49 numbers is drawn with the same probability p = 12.24%.

Longest current gap

27

Number 15, source: history

Numbers above twice the expected gap

5

threshold: 14.4 draws, source: model

Median current gap

4.0

expected: 7.2, of 49 numbers

Note. P(G ≥ g) says how often such a gap occurs, not that it is about to end. A number that has not been drawn for a long time has exactly the same chance in the next draw as any other.

Current gaps compared with the model

Current number of draws without a hit for every number. The dashed line marks the expected gap in the random model. 27.0 0 15: 27.0, expected 7.2 15 49: 20.0, expected 7.2 49 4: 19.0, expected 7.2 4 26: 17.0, expected 7.2 26 33: 15.0, expected 7.2 33 27: 14.0, expected 7.2 27 8: 13.0, expected 7.2 8 23: 13.0, expected 7.2 23 16: 12.0, expected 7.2 16 32: 10.0, expected 7.2 32 11: 9.0, expected 7.2 11 17: 9.0, expected 7.2 17 31: 9.0, expected 7.2 31 35: 9.0, expected 7.2 35 13: 7.0, expected 7.2 13 21: 7.0, expected 7.2 21 43: 7.0, expected 7.2 43 14: 6.0, expected 7.2 14 20: 6.0, expected 7.2 20 29: 6.0, expected 7.2 29 2: 5.0, expected 7.2 2 5: 5.0, expected 7.2 5 12: 5.0, expected 7.2 12 44: 5.0, expected 7.2 44 3: 4.0, expected 7.2 3 6: 4.0, expected 7.2 6 9: 4.0, expected 7.2 9 22: 4.0, expected 7.2 22 40: 4.0, expected 7.2 40 48: 4.0, expected 7.2 48 18: 3.0, expected 7.2 18 37: 3.0, expected 7.2 37 19: 2.0, expected 7.2 19 28: 2.0, expected 7.2 28 34: 2.0, expected 7.2 34 36: 2.0, expected 7.2 36 38: 2.0, expected 7.2 38 7: 1.0, expected 7.2 7 25: 1.0, expected 7.2 25 30: 1.0, expected 7.2 30 41: 1.0, expected 7.2 41 42: 1.0, expected 7.2 42 45: 1.0, expected 7.2 45 1: 0.0, expected 7.2 1 10: 0.0, expected 7.2 10 24: 0.0, expected 7.2 24 39: 0.0, expected 7.2 39 46: 0.0, expected 7.2 46 47: 0.0, expected 7.2 47

Bars: observed history; dashed line: expected count from the random model.

Gap table

Sorted by the longest current gap by default. Clicking a header sorts the table. The percentile counts this number's finished gaps strictly shorter than the current one.

Expected (model)
15
27 7.2 2.9% 97.6% (of 802) 75 (29.04.1998–20.01.1999)
49
20 7.2 7.3% 93.3% (of 779) 51 (14.07.2009–12.11.2009)
4
19 7.2 8.4% 92.8% (of 830) 67 (11.04.1992–05.12.1992)
26
17 7.2 10.9% 89.1% (of 808) 45 (26.09.2013–11.01.2014)
33
15 7.2 14.1% 83.5% (of 752) 51 (28.12.2023–27.04.2024)
27
14 7.2 16.1% 86% (of 837) 48 (01.05.2025–23.08.2025)
8
13 7.2 18.3% 80.2% (of 778) 70 (30.01.2010–15.07.2010)
23
13 7.2 18.3% 81.8% (of 780) 44 (28.07.2007–22.11.2007)
16
12 7.2 20.9% 78.7% (of 765) 61 (28.11.1965–05.02.1967)
32
10 7.2 27.1% 73% (of 806) 51 (14.02.2004–14.08.2004)
11
9 7.2 30.9% 66.1% (of 787) 54 (10.09.2020–16.01.2021)
17
9 7.2 30.9% 72.9% (of 863) 54 (11.07.2017–16.11.2017)
31
9 7.2 30.9% 70.5% (of 810) 48 (05.07.2011–27.10.2011)
35
9 7.2 30.9% 66.3% (of 759) 77 (08.11.2025–09.05.2026)
13
7 7.2 40.1% 60.2% (of 830) 47 (02.02.1985–04.01.1986)
21
7 7.2 40.1% 62.8% (of 855) 47 (02.01.2021–24.04.2021)
43
7 7.2 40.1% 57% (of 753) 63 (09.03.2013–06.08.2013)
14
6 7.2 45.7% 55.8% (of 815) 54 (03.02.1999–14.08.1999)
20
6 7.2 45.7% 56.2% (of 818) 55 (07.09.2021–15.01.2022)
29
6 7.2 45.7% 52.6% (of 784) 50 (01.06.1980–24.05.1981)
2
5 7.2 52.0% 49% (of 815) 65 (29.06.1969–04.10.1970)
5
5 7.2 52.0% 48% (of 802) 50 (15.09.1990–09.03.1991)
12
5 7.2 52.0% 45.8% (of 771) 59 (02.08.2008–20.12.2008)
44
5 7.2 52.0% 46.8% (of 774) 56 (13.02.1999–01.09.1999)
3
4 7.2 59.3% 39.8% (of 788) 70 (11.05.2023–24.10.2023)
6
4 7.2 59.3% 41.7% (of 833) 82 (19.06.1977–21.01.1979)
9
4 7.2 59.3% 40.1% (of 791) 49 (03.08.1994–25.01.1995)
22
4 7.2 59.3% 39.5% (of 798) 59 (23.02.2023–13.07.2023)
40
4 7.2 59.3% 40.9% (of 792) 67 (15.12.1984–05.04.1986)
48
4 7.2 59.3% 38% (of 718) 92 (19.02.1967–01.12.1968)
18
3 7.2 67.6% 31% (of 797) 57 (08.07.1962–18.08.1963)
37
3 7.2 67.6% 32.6% (of 774) 50 (22.01.2022–21.05.2022)
19
2 7.2 77.0% 20.7% (of 778) 45 (16.07.2015–31.10.2015)
28
2 7.2 77.0% 23.5% (of 820) 54 (19.06.1999–29.12.1999)
34
2 7.2 77.0% 25.4% (of 844) 78 (15.08.2020–16.02.2021)
36
2 7.2 77.0% 23.3% (of 831) 64 (10.02.1990–29.09.1990)
38
2 7.2 77.0% 24.5% (of 849) 55 (02.11.1985–29.11.1986)
7
1 7.2 87.8% 12.7% (of 811) 50 (30.11.1985–22.11.1986)
25
1 7.2 87.8% 12.3% (of 831) 63 (19.07.1970–10.10.1971)
30
1 7.2 87.8% 13.6% (of 792) 68 (23.09.1973–19.01.1975)
41
1 7.2 87.8% 12.3% (of 782) 48 (28.08.2025–20.12.2025)
42
1 7.2 87.8% 13.8% (of 821) 55 (22.04.2017–31.08.2017)
45
1 7.2 87.8% 11.3% (of 812) 56 (29.07.2023–09.12.2023)
1
0 7.2 100.0% 0% (of 815) 55 (07.11.2009–18.03.2010)
10
0 7.2 100.0% 0% (of 802) 73 (01.12.1999–16.08.2000)
24
0 7.2 100.0% 0% (of 835) 52 (02.06.2011–04.10.2011)
39
0 7.2 100.0% 0% (of 769) 73 (09.06.2012–29.11.2012)
46
0 7.2 100.0% 0% (of 806) 47 (24.01.1987–26.12.1987)
47
0 7.2 100.0% 0% (of 765) 77 (14.12.2024–14.06.2025)

Method and source

Source: full history of draws (6,546 draws). The current gap is right-censored — it is unknown when it ends, so it enters neither the distribution of finished gaps nor the percentile.

Model: each number is drawn with probability p = 6/49 ≈ 12.24%. The gap between hits then follows a geometric distribution: P(G ≥ g) = (1 − p)g, and the expected gap length is (1 − p)/p = 7.2. P(G ≥ g) describes a single, pre-selected number. The longest gap among 49 numbers is extreme by definition, so its low P does not mean a departure from the model — with that many numbers one of them always had the longest gap.

The percentile is the share of a number's finished gaps strictly shorter than the current one. With few finished gaps this describes a handful of observations, not a test. This page runs no significance tests: gaps of different numbers in the same draws are not independent and a naive pooled test would understate the p-value.

Interactive tools

Explore the same data actively. The tools describe history and the random model; they do not predict the next result.

My selection — check its properties against history

This describes the entered selection and its position in the historical sample. It does not increase its chance.

Open the full selection analyzer →

History player — move through past draws

Choose a year, use the slider or start automatic playback. This is a presentation of recorded results, not a forecast.

Open the module to load the available years.

Random-model simulator — see ordinary random variation

Generate independent draws with the rules of this game and compare observed counts with the common expected value. Every run is different.

What do these numbers show?
  • The longest current gap belonged to number 15: 27 draws without a hit (history, N = 6,546). In the random model a gap at least this long occurred with probability 2.9% for a single number. Of its own finished gaps, 97.6% were shorter (out of 802 gaps).
  • 5 of 49 numbers had a current gap longer than twice the expected one (7.2 draws, model).
  • The median current gap was 4.0 draws versus an expected 7.2 in the model. None of these figures says anything about the next draw.

These are historical data. Each draw is independent of previous draws, so these numbers do not tell us what will be drawn next.

How do I use this page?
  1. Read in the table how many draws have passed since each number was last drawn.
  2. Compare this gap with the model expectation and with the number's own history (percentile).
  3. Click a column header to sort the table by another measure.
  4. Check the record: the number's longest finished gap and when it lasted.

What this page does not do: does not point to numbers to play — a long gap does not raise the chance in the next draw.

Related analyses

← All statistics Lotto

Advertisement
Offline app and draw notifications

My saved selections

Selections saved only in this browser. Numbers are shown exactly as saved; this is not a lottery ticket.

Open the My saved selections hub

The file stays on your device. A faulty file changes nothing.